?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Statistics for fun - The Motive Center
June 28th, 2006
11:42 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Statistics for fun

(6 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:stevekelner
Date:July 4th, 2006 04:37 am (UTC)

Re: Stats

(Link)
No! What's the story on that? Censored data? Does that mean they didn't have the data they needed because it was censored?
[User Picture]
From:albionwood
Date:July 4th, 2006 04:51 pm (UTC)

Re: Stats

(Link)
"Censored" in statistics means data that are known only to be above or below some threshold value. In my field, the threshold values are laboratory limits of detection, which "censor" the numbers below the limits. Often, a large proportion of the data are below the detection limit. These limits are based on technical processes, not health risks - so the censored data might be important, yet conventional statistics cannot make use of them.

In the Challenger case, engineers were concerned about the possible failure of O-rings at low temperatures. They had done a number of tests at different temperature ranges, and the night before the launch, they sent a graph to managers in an attempt to convince them to scrub. The graph showed the number of damage incidents as a function of temperature, but it had a major flaw: Tests where no damage had occured were not plotted. (This is very common, in fact it is the usual way people treat censored data - they exclude all the data below the threshold, because it isn't amenable to conventional analysis.) No data were available for the very low temperatures expected at launch time, because no testing had been done at those temps.

The graph showed only a few points, with no apparent pattern. The Rogers Commission produced a graph, constructed the same way as the original but with the non-detect values added, indicating a pattern of increasing failures with decreasing temperatures. A graph showing the proportion of failures by temperature range makes it strikingly obvious that low temperatures presented a greatly increased risk of failure.

(This is condensed from the introduction to Dennis Helsel's extremely useful book, "Nondetects and Data Analysis," Wiley Interscience 2005. It's the most powerful introduction to a book I've ever read.)
Motivate Your Writing! Powered by LiveJournal.com